↓ Skip to main content

Archaebacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, September 1978
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 1,438)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
31 patents
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
522 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Archaebacteria
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, September 1978
DOI 10.1007/bf01734485
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. R. Woese, L. J. Magrum, G. E. Fox

Abstract

Experimental work published elsewhere has shown that the Archaebacteria encompass several distinct subgroups including methanogens, extreme halophiles, and various thermoacidophiles. The common characteristics of Archaebacteria known to date are these: (1) the presence of characteristic tRNAs and ribosomal RNAs; (2) the absence of peptidoglycan cell walls, with in many cases, replacement by a largely proteinaceous coat; (3) the occurrence of ether linked lipids built from phytanyl chains and (4) in all cases known so far, their occurrence only in unusual habitats. These organisms contain a number of 'eucaryotic features' in addition to their many bacterial attributes. This is interpreted as a strong indication that the Archaebacteria, while not actually eucaryotic, do indeed represents a third separate, line of descent as originally proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 10 3%
United States 9 3%
Germany 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 275 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 20%
Researcher 47 15%
Student > Master 41 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Professor 17 6%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 48 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 136 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 12%
Chemistry 18 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 5%
Environmental Science 14 5%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 54 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,162,095
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#26
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57
of 5,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them