↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between MODIS-derived day and night cloud cover and surface observations over the North China Plain

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Comparison between MODIS-derived day and night cloud cover and surface observations over the North China Plain
Published in
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00376-017-7070-x
Authors

Xiao Zhang, Saichun Tan, Guangyu Shi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 21%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 21%
Computer Science 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,973,958
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
#294
of 872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,926
of 443,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.