↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Numerical Simulation of Cracking Propagation of Asphalt Concrete Beam

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 100)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Numerical Simulation of Cracking Propagation of Asphalt Concrete Beam
Published in
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11668-017-0307-2
Authors

Xiaojing Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,841,789
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention
#2
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,890
of 319,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them