↓ Skip to main content

To use or not to use torpor? Activity and body temperature as predictors

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
To use or not to use torpor? Activity and body temperature as predictors
Published in
The Science of Nature, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00114-007-0215-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nereda Christian, Fritz Geiser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
China 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 71 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 69%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,305,323
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#829
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,243
of 174,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.