↓ Skip to main content

Field observations on the developmental ascent of larval Euphausia superba (Crustacea)

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, September 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Field observations on the developmental ascent of larval Euphausia superba (Crustacea)
Published in
Polar Biology, September 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf00258263
Authors

Irmtraut Hempel, Gotthilf Hempel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 65%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#598
of 1,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,983
of 10,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.