| Title |
Efficacy of Biofeedback-Based Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10484-005-8420-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Crider, Alan G. Glaros, Richard N. Gevirtz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 33% |
| Psychology | 20 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2011.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#192
of 466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,884
of 163,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.