↓ Skip to main content

An exponential example for Terlaky's pivoting rule for the criss-cross simplex method

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematical Programming, January 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
An exponential example for Terlaky's pivoting rule for the criss-cross simplex method
Published in
Mathematical Programming, January 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01585729
Authors

C. Roos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Student > Bachelor 3 38%
Lecturer 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 38%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 25%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Programming
#145
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,380
of 58,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Programming
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.