↓ Skip to main content

Triton, Pluto, Centaurs, and Trans-Neptunian Bodies

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Triton, Pluto, Centaurs, and Trans-Neptunian Bodies
Published in
Space Science Reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11214-005-1964-0
Authors

Dale P. Cruikshank

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 13 52%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 20%
Chemistry 3 12%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,554,364
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#408
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,444
of 140,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.