↓ Skip to main content

Coupled Clouds and Chemistry of the Giant Planets— A Case for Multiprobes

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
47 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Coupled Clouds and Chemistry of the Giant Planets— A Case for Multiprobes
Published in
Space Science Reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11214-005-1951-5
Authors

Sushil K. Atreya, Ah-San Wong

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 11 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 23%
Engineering 4 10%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Chemistry 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,749,471
of 23,563,389 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#485
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,752
of 141,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,563,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.