↓ Skip to main content

Disease and the devil: density‐dependent epidemiological processes explain historical population fluctuations in the Tasmanian devil

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disease and the devil: density‐dependent epidemiological processes explain historical population fluctuations in the Tasmanian devil
Published in
Ecography, March 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04088.x
Authors

Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Barry W. Brook

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Australia 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Hungary 1 1%
Mozambique 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 85 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Professor 9 9%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 50%
Environmental Science 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Mathematics 4 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 9 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2013.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#1,634
of 2,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,619
of 79,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.