↓ Skip to main content

Historical notes on horseradish

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, April 1969
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Historical notes on horseradish
Published in
Economic Botany, April 1969
DOI 10.1007/bf02860621
Authors

J. W. Courter, A. M. Rhodes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,041,539
of 24,171,551 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#289
of 868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#572
of 2,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,171,551 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.