↓ Skip to main content

Management of the Cardiovascular Complications of Tricyclic Antidepressant Poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in Toxicological Reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Management of the Cardiovascular Complications of Tricyclic Antidepressant Poisoning
Published in
Toxicological Reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/00139709-200524030-00012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally M. Bradberry, H. K. Ruben Thanacoody, Barbara E. Watt, Simon H. L. Thomas, J. Allister Vale

Abstract

Experimental studies suggest that both alkalinisation and sodium loading are effective in reducing cardiotoxicity independently. Species and experimental differences may explain why sodium bicarbonate appears to work by sodium loading in some studies and by a pH change in others. In the only case series, the administration of intravenous sodium bicarbonate to achieve a systemic pH of 7.5-7.55 reduced QRS prolongation, reversed hypotension (although colloid was also given) and improved mental status in patients with moderate to severe tricyclic antidepressant poisoning. This clinical study supports the use of sodium bicarbonate in the management of the cardiovascular complications of tricyclic antidepressant poisoning. However, the clinical indications and dosing recommendations remain to be clarified. Hypotension should be managed initially by administration of colloid or crystalloid solutions, guided by central venous pressure monitoring. Based on experimental and clinical studies, sodium bicarbonate should then be administered. If hypotension persists despite adequate filling pressure and sodium bicarbonate administration, inotropic support should be initiated. In a non-randomised controlled trial in rats, epinephrine resulted in a higher survival rate and was superior to norepinephrine both when the drugs were used alone or when epinephrine was used in combination with sodium bicarbonate. Sodium bicarbonate alone resulted in a modest increase in survival rate but this increased markedly when sodium bicarbonate was used with epinephrine or norepinephrine. Clinical studies suggest benefit from norepinephrine and dopamine; in an uncontrolled study the former appeared more effective. Glucagon has also been of benefit. Experimental studies suggest extracorporeal circulation membrane oxygenation is also of potential value. The immediate treatment of arrhythmias involves correcting hypoxia, electrolyte abnormalities, hypotension and acidosis. Administration of sodium bicarbonate may resolve arrhythmias even in the absence of acidosis and, only if this therapy fails, should conventional antiarrhythmic drugs be used. The class 1b agent phenytoin may reverse conduction defects and may be used for resistant ventricular tachycardia. There is also limited evidence for benefit from magnesium infusion. However, class 1a and 1c antiarrhythmic drugs should be avoided since they worsen sodium channel blockade, further slow conduction velocity and depress contractility. Class II agents (beta-blockers) may also precipitate hypotension and cardiac arrest.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 15%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 21 27%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 58%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Toxicological Reviews
#39
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,860
of 186,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toxicological Reviews
#34
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.