↓ Skip to main content

Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, January 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0306-5456(00)00022-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline S.E. Homer, Gregory K. Davis, Pat M. Brodie, Athena Sheehan, Lesley M. Barclay, Jo Wills, Michael G. Chapman

Abstract

To test whether a new community-based model of continuity of care provided by midwives and obstetricians improved maternal clinical outcomes, in particular a reduced caesarean section rate.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 119 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Master 13 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Other 9 7%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Psychology 5 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 34 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#3,466
of 6,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,247
of 114,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.