| Title |
Age variation in the upper limit of hearing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00243505 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shintaro Takeda, Ikuharu Morioka, Kazuhisa Miyashita, Akeharu Okumura, Yoshiaki Yoshida, Kenji Matsumoto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 3 | 25% |
| Engineering | 3 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,488
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,280
of 17,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.