You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of drought-response genes and a study of their expression during sucrose accumulation and water deficit in sugarcane culms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-11-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hayati M Iskandar, Rosanne E Casu, Andrew T Fletcher, Susanne Schmidt, Jingsheng Xu, Donald J Maclean, John M Manners, Graham D Bonnett |
| Abstract |
The ability of sugarcane to accumulate high concentrations of sucrose in its culm requires adaptation to maintain cellular function under the high solute load. We have investigated the expression of 51 genes implicated in abiotic stress to determine their expression in the context of sucrose accumulation by studying mature and immature culm internodes of a high sucrose accumulating sugarcane cultivar. Using a sub-set of eight genes, expression was examined in mature internode tissues of sugarcane cultivars as well as ancestral and more widely related species with a range of sucrose contents. Expression of these genes was also analysed in internode tissue from a high sucrose cultivar undergoing water deficit stress to compare effects of sucrose accumulation and water deficit. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 3% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 128 | 74% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,316,776
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#1,482
of 3,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,875
of 181,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.