↓ Skip to main content

Galileo trajectory design

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, May 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
20 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Galileo trajectory design
Published in
Space Science Reviews, May 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00216849
Authors

Louis A. D'Amario, Larry E. Bright, Aron A. Wolf

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 46%
Physics and Astronomy 5 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,644,824
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#478
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,636
of 19,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them