↓ Skip to main content

Harmful algal blooms: causes, impacts and detection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
461 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1088 Mendeley
Title
Harmful algal blooms: causes, impacts and detection
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, July 2003
DOI 10.1007/s10295-003-0074-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin G Sellner, Gregory J Doucette, Gary J Kirkpatrick

Abstract

Blooms of autotrophic algae and some heterotrophic protists are increasingly frequent in coastal waters around the world and are collectively grouped as harmful algal blooms (HABs). Blooms of these organisms are attributed to two primary factors: natural processes such as circulation, upwelling relaxation, and river flow; and, anthropogenic loadings leading to eutrophication. Unfortunately, the latter is commonly assumed to be the primary cause of all blooms, which is not the case in many instances. Moreover, although it is generally acknowledged that occurrences of these phenomena are increasing throughout the world's oceans, the reasons for this apparent increase remain debated and include not only eutrophication but increased observation efforts in coastal zones of the world. There is a rapidly advancing monitoring effort resulting from the perception of increased impacts from these HABs, manifested as expanding routine coastal monitoring programs, rapid development and deployment of new detection methods for individual species, toxins, and toxicities, and expansion of coastal modeling activities towards observational forecasts of bloom landfall and eventually bloom prediction. Together, these many efforts will provide resource managers with the tools needed to develop effective strategies for the management and mitigation of HABs and their frequently devastating impacts on the coastal environment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,088 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Other 11 1%
Unknown 1049 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 191 18%
Student > Master 178 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 162 15%
Researcher 126 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 4%
Other 120 11%
Unknown 265 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 304 28%
Environmental Science 202 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 73 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 5%
Engineering 50 5%
Other 114 10%
Unknown 292 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,864,085
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#51
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,819
of 53,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.