| Title |
Protecting Participants in Thought Experiments: The Role of the Research Ethics Committee
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11673-017-9831-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Shaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1 | 33% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,975,379
of 24,557,820 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#131
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,998
of 449,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,557,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.