↓ Skip to main content

Privacy and human behavior in the age of information

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
196 X users
weibo
2 weibo users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1037 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1105 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Privacy and human behavior in the age of information
Published in
Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aaa1465
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Acquisti, Laura Brandimarte, George Loewenstein

Abstract

This Review summarizes and draws connections between diverse streams of empirical research on privacy behavior. We use three themes to connect insights from social and behavioral sciences: people's uncertainty about the consequences of privacy-related behaviors and their own preferences over those consequences; the context-dependence of people's concern, or lack thereof, about privacy; and the degree to which privacy concerns are malleable—manipulable by commercial and governmental interests. Organizing our discussion by these themes, we offer observations concerning the role of public policy in the protection of privacy in the information age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 196 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1078 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 231 21%
Student > Master 174 16%
Researcher 99 9%
Student > Bachelor 96 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 77 7%
Other 168 15%
Unknown 260 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 223 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 187 17%
Social Sciences 148 13%
Psychology 61 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 53 5%
Other 132 12%
Unknown 301 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 525. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#48,512
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,909
of 83,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#456
of 367,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#36
of 1,196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.