↓ Skip to main content

Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Huntington’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Huntington’s Disease
Published in
Drugs, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/11534430-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Frank, Joseph Jankovic

Abstract

There is inevitable physical, cognitive and behavioural decline in Huntington's disease (HD), a dominantly inherited progressive neurological disorder. The hallmark of the disease is chorea, an involuntary brief movement that tends to flow between body regions. HD is diagnosed clinically with genetic confirmation. Predictive testing is available; however, it should be undertaken with caution in patients at risk for the disease but without clinical disease expression. Ongoing observational trials have identified not only early subtle motor signs, but also striatal volume, verbal memory and olfaction as possible early manifestations of clinical disease. Multiple areas of the brain degenerate, with dopamine, glutamate and GABA being the predominant neurotransmitters affected in HD. Although many pharmacotherapies have been evaluated targeting these neurotransmitters, few well conducted trials for symptomatic or neuroprotective interventions have yielded positive results. Tetrabenazine is one of the better studied and more effective agents for reducing chorea, although with a risk of potentially serious adverse effects. Newer antipsychotic agents such as olanzapine and aripiprazole may have adequate efficacy with a more favourable adverse-effect profile than older antipsychotics for treating chorea and psychosis. In this review, the pathogenesis, epidemiology and diagnosis of HD are discussed as background for understanding potential pharmacological treatment options. Potential strategies to delay the progression of HD that have been studied and are planned for the future are summarized. Although there is no current method to change the course of this devastating disease, education and symptomatic therapies are effective tools available to clinicians and the families affected by HD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 146 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 20%
Student > Master 21 14%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 11%
Psychology 16 10%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 40 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#1,511
of 3,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,665
of 189,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#562
of 1,461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.