↓ Skip to main content

Dopamine and retinal function

Overview of attention for article published in Documenta Ophthalmologica, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 492)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
673 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
424 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Dopamine and retinal function
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica, January 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:doop.0000019487.88486.0a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Witkovsky

Abstract

This review summarizes the experimental evidence in support of dopamine's role as a chemical messenger for light adaptation. Dopamine is released by a unique set of amacrine cells and activates D1 and D2 dopamine receptors distributed throughout the retina. Multiple dopamine-dependent physiological mechanisms result in an increased signal flow through cone circuits and a diminution of signal flow through rod circuits. Dopamine also has multiple trophic roles in retinal function related to circadian rhythmicity, cell survival and eye growth. In a reciprocal way, the health of the dopaminergic neurons depends on their receiving light-driven synaptic inputs. Dopamine neurons appear early in development, become functional in advance of the animal's onset of vision and begin to die in aging animals. Some diseases affecting photoreceptor function also diminish day/night differences in dopamine release and turnover. A reduction in retinal dopamine, as occurs in Parkinsonian patients, results in reduced visual contrast sensitivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 404 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 22%
Researcher 64 15%
Student > Master 42 10%
Student > Bachelor 36 8%
Professor 30 7%
Other 73 17%
Unknown 87 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 22%
Neuroscience 91 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 15%
Psychology 23 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Other 39 9%
Unknown 96 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,615,234
of 25,670,640 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#14
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,686
of 144,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,670,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them