↓ Skip to main content

From so simple a beginning - what amphioxus can teach us about placode evolution.

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Developmental Biology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From so simple a beginning - what amphioxus can teach us about placode evolution.
Published in
International Journal of Developmental Biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1387/ijdb.170127gs
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerhard Schlosser

Abstract

Cranial placodes are an evolutionary novelty of vertebrates that give rise to many cranial sense organs and ganglia, as well as to the neurosecretory anterior pituitary. Although amphioxus does not have placodes, it shares with vertebrates several of the ectodermal patterning mechanisms and cell types that are important in placode development. Comparisons between amphioxus, vertebrates and other groups provide us with important insights into what the last common chordate ancestor probably looked like and allow us to propose a scenario for how placodes evolved by rewiring of gene regulatory networks. After reviewing ectodermal patterning and the cytodifferentiation of neurosecretory and sensory cells in amphioxus, this review will argue that the evolutionary origin of cranial placodes involved 1) the concentration of sensory and neurosecretory cell types in the head by linking their development to ancient cranial ectodermal patterning mechanisms; and 2) the formation of high density arrays of sensorineural precursors by intercalating a progenitor expansion module into the gene regulatory network driving differentiation of sensory or neurosecretory cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Developmental Biology
#618
of 774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,228
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Developmental Biology
#33
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.