↓ Skip to main content

Sex determination in mammals — Before and after the evolution of SRY

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
25 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Sex determination in mammals — Before and after the evolution of SRY
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00018-008-8109-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. C. Wallis, P. D. Waters, J. A. M. Graves

Abstract

Therian mammals (marsupials and placentals) have an XX female: XY male sex chromosome system, which is homologous to autosomes in other vertebrates. The testis-determining gene, SRY, is conserved on the Y throughout therians, but is absent in other vertebrates, suggesting that the mammal system evolved about 310 million years ago (MYA). However, recent work on the basal monotreme mammals has completely changed our conception of how and when this change occurred. Platypus and echidna lack SRY, and the therian X and Y are represented by autosomes, implying that SRY evolved in therians after their divergence from monotremes only 166 MYA. Clues to the ancestral mechanism usurped by SRY in therians are provided by the monotremes, whose sex chromosomes are homologous to the ZW of birds. This suggests that the therian X and Y, and the SRY gene, evolved from an ancient bird-like sex chromosome system which predates the divergence of mammals and reptiles 310 MYA.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Caledonia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 24%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 24 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,940,289
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#714
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,209
of 83,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.