↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between melatonin and bone resorption rhythms in premenopausal women

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Relationship between melatonin and bone resorption rhythms in premenopausal women
Published in
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00774-017-0896-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa A. St Hilaire, Shadab A. Rahman, Joshua J. Gooley, Paula A. Witt-Enderby, Steven W. Lockley

Abstract

Although evidence exists for a daily rhythm in bone metabolism, the contribution of factors such as melatonin levels, the light-dark cycle, and the sleep-wake cycle is difficult to differentiate given their highly correlated time courses. To examine these influences on bone resorption, we collected 48-h sequential urine samples under both ambulatory (8-h sleep:16-h wake) and constant routine (CR) (constant wake, posture, nutrition and dim light) conditions from 20 healthy premenopausal women. Urinary 6-sulphatoxymelatonin (aMT6s; ng/h) and the bone resorption marker amino-terminal cross-linked collagen I telopeptide (NTx; bone collagen equivalents nM/h) were assayed and fit by cosinor models to determine significant 24-h rhythms and acrophase. Most participants had significant 24-h aMT6s rhythms during both ambulatory and CR conditions (95 and 85%, respectively), but fewer had significant 24-h NTx rhythms (70 and 70%, respectively). Among individuals with significant rhythms, mean (± SD) aMT6s acrophase times were 3:57 ± 1:50 and 3:43 ± 1:25 h under ambulatory and CR conditions, respectively, and 23:44 ± 5:55 and 3:06 ± 5:15 h, respectively, for NTx. Mean 24-h levels of both aMT6s and NTx were significantly higher during CR compared with ambulatory conditions (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.03, respectively). Menstrual phase (follicular versus luteal) had no impact on aMT6s or NTx timing or 24-h levels. This study confirms an endogenous circadian rhythm in NTx with a night-time peak when measured under CR conditions, but also confirms that environmental factors such as the sleep-wake or light-dark cycles, posture or meal timing affects overall concentrations and peak timing under ambulatory conditions, the significance of which remains unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 11 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,521,679
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#343
of 787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,799
of 447,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.