↓ Skip to main content

Antipsychotics use: 2006–2013 trends in prevalence and incidence and characterization of users

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Antipsychotics use: 2006–2013 trends in prevalence and incidence and characterization of users
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00228-017-2406-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Montastruc, Anne Bénard-Laribière, Pernelle Noize, Elodie Pambrun, Fabienne Diaz-Bazin, Marie Tournier, Bernard Bégaud, Antoine Pariente

Abstract

The present study was conducted to describe antipsychotic (AP) prevalent and incident use, characteristics of AP users, and their trends in the French population. A cross-sectional study was repeated yearly from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2013 (for prevalence analysis) or to December 31, 2012 (for incidence analysis) using the French Health Insurance reimbursement database (Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires, EGB). For each year studied, prevalent and incident AP users were described in terms of age and gender overall, and according to the type of AP (FGAPs or SGAPs) used at index date. In addition, concurrent medications and comorbidities that a priori contraindicate the use of drugs having atropinic properties were researched. Prevalence and incidence remained relatively stable along the 2007-2013 period. Trends slightly decreased, from 2.07% (n = 10,252) to 2.05% (n = 11,015) for prevalence, and from 0.73% (n = 3461) to 0.66% (n = 3363) for incidence, especially in elderly, in contrast of children and adolescents (+ 39% for prevalence, from 184 to 271). The number of coprescribed drugs was found high (median = 5) and remained constant over time. In 2013, about 7% of prevalent AP users presented with a comorbidity increasing the risk of atropinic ADRs, and 36% used at least one concurrent atropinic drug. In incident AP users, these numbers were of 8 and 29%, respectively. The present study highlighted a marked shift from FGAPs toward SGAPs, as well as an increase in AP use in children and adolescents in France.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 23%
Researcher 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,897,894
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#222
of 2,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,294
of 444,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.