You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sir John F. W. Herschel and Charles Darwin: Nineteenth-Century Science and Its Methodology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1086/695719 |
| Authors |
Charles H. Pence |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 56% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| Austria | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 6 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 29% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,457,621
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science
#6
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,379
of 345,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.