↓ Skip to main content

Inter-human and animal-directed empathy: A test for evolutionary biases in empathetic responding

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioural Processes, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inter-human and animal-directed empathy: A test for evolutionary biases in empathetic responding
Published in
Behavioural Processes, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emina Prguda, David L. Neumann

Abstract

Empathy is facilitated by the perceived similarity between the object and subject. Conversely, nurturance has been suggested to influence empathy, in that humans have an ability to empathise with non-kin in a similar way as with their own offspring when certain characteristics (e.g., childlikeness) are present. To examine the combined effects of similarity and nurturance, participants (n=69) were presented with images of infant and adult human and wild non-human animals (non-human primates, quadruped wild mammals, and wild birds) depicted in negative, victimising situations. Stronger phasic skin conductance responses and subjective ratings of empathy and arousal were observed for phylogenetically similar species. Subjective empathy and arousal ratings were greater for human infants but this did not extend to the non-human infants. Heart rate was lower during infant than adult stimuli presentations, however, the magnitude of change resembled that previously reported for neutral stimuli presentations. Although a similarity effect is widely acknowledged in the literature, the present findings point to the importance of taking into account both the age and the level of similarity with the target to gain a fuller understanding of empathy towards others of our own and different species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 108 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 25%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,120,705
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Behavioural Processes
#351
of 2,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,290
of 260,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioural Processes
#21
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.