↓ Skip to main content

Global application of stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes to wildlife forensics

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
837 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
868 Mendeley
Title
Global application of stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes to wildlife forensics
Published in
Oecologia, February 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00442-004-1813-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel J. Bowen, Leonard I. Wassenaar, Keith A. Hobson

Abstract

Stable isotopes are being increasingly used in wildlife forensics as means of determining the origin and movement of animals. The heavy isotope content of precipitated water and snow (deltaD(p), delta(18)O(p)) varies widely and systematically across the globe, providing a label that is incorporated through diet into animal tissue. As a result, these isotopes are potentially ideal tracers of geographic origin. The hydrogen and oxygen isotope tracer method has excellent potential where (1) spatial variation of precipitation isotopes exist, and (2) strong, mechanistic relationships link precipitation and isotope ratios in biological tissue. Here, we present a method for interpolation of precipitation isotope values and use it to create global basemaps of growing-season (GS) and mean annual (MA) deltaD(p) and delta(18)O(p). The use of these maps for forensic application is demonstrated using previously published isotope data for bird feathers (deltaD(f)) in North America and Europe. The precipitation maps show that the greatest potential for applying hydrogen and oxygen isotope forensics exists in mid- to high-latitude continental regions, where strong spatial isotope gradients exist. We demonstrate that deltaD(f)/deltaD(p) relationships have significant predictive power both in North America and Europe, and show how zones of confidence for the assignment of origin can be described using these predictive relationships. Our analysis focuses on wildlife forensics, but the maps and approaches presented here will be equally applicable to criminal forensic studies involving biological materials. These maps are available in GIS format at http://www.waterisotopes.org.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 868 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Argentina 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Other 15 2%
Unknown 808 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 208 24%
Researcher 172 20%
Student > Master 139 16%
Student > Bachelor 58 7%
Other 44 5%
Other 140 16%
Unknown 107 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 353 41%
Environmental Science 157 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 112 13%
Social Sciences 29 3%
Arts and Humanities 19 2%
Other 58 7%
Unknown 140 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,525,716
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#634
of 5,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,989
of 77,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.