↓ Skip to main content

Rooting Around the Eutherian Family Tree: the Origin and Relations of the Taeniodonta

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mammalian Evolution, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
33 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Rooting Around the Eutherian Family Tree: the Origin and Relations of the Taeniodonta
Published in
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10914-013-9230-9
Authors

Deborah L. Rook, John P. Hunter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 13%
Brazil 1 7%
Unknown 12 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 40%
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Philosophy 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,610,011
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#250
of 448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,706
of 200,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them