↓ Skip to main content

Loneliness in psychosis: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 2,709)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
92 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
Title
Loneliness in psychosis: a systematic review
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00127-018-1482-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle H. Lim, John F. M. Gleeson, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, David L. Penn

Abstract

The aim of the review is to understand the relationships between loneliness and related psychological and social factors in individuals with psychosis. Loneliness is poorly understood in people with psychosis. Given the myriad of social challenges facing individuals with psychosis, these findings can inform psychosocial interventions that specifically target loneliness in this vulnerable group. We adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and systematically reviewed empirical studies that measured loneliness either as a main outcome or as an associated variable in individuals with psychosis. A total of ten studies examining loneliness in people diagnosed with a psychotic disorder were examined. Heterogeneity in the assessment of loneliness was found, and there were contradictory findings on the relationship between loneliness and psychotic symptomatology. In individuals with psychosis, loneliness may be influenced by psychological and social factors such as increased depression, psychosis, and anxiety, poor social support, poor quality of life, more severe internalised stigma and perceived discrimination, and low self-esteem. The relationship between loneliness and psychosis remains poorly understood due to a lack of rigorous studies. Although having strong social relationships is crucial to facilitate recovery from serious mental illness, psychosocial interventions that specifically target loneliness in individuals with psychosis are lacking and sorely needed. Interventions targeting loneliness in those with psychosis will also need to account for additional barriers associated with psychosis (e.g., social skill deficits, impoverished social networks, and negative symptoms).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 294 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 101 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 90 31%
Social Sciences 19 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 5%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 123 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#241,173
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#34
of 2,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,595
of 456,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.