| Title |
Correlation of Tissue Transglutaminase with Modified Marsh Grading in Celiac Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12098-017-2323-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rakesh Jora, Vikrant Raghuvanshi, Vikas Payal, Pramod Sharma, Shree Krishan Vishnoi |
| Abstract |
To find out correlation between serum anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin-A (tTGA) levels and Marsh grading on duodenal histopathology in Celiac disease (CD). In a prospective cohort study, a total of 52 symptomatic patients between age group of 2-18 y were enroled. All enroled patients were subjected to upper GI endoscopy by an experienced endoscopist. Two biopsies each from the bulb (D1) and second part (D2) of the duodenum were taken and Marsh grading was performed by a single experienced pathologist. Serum tTGA levels were also performed to find out correlation between serum tTGA levels and Marsh grading. The mean age of the patients was 8.21 ± 3.45 y (Range: 2-16 y). Anemia was the most common non-gastrointestinal (GI) sign and was present in 73% of the cases. However the authors could not find out any significant association between Marsh grading and hemoglobin levels (r = 0.32, p > 0.05). Serum tTGA levels were found to be positively correlated with Marsh grading (Spearmen correlation coefficient ρ = 0.74, p 0.000). Significant differences were found in tTGA levels between different Marsh gradings (ANOVA test) (p 0.000). Receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis cut-off value of serum tTGA for predicting villous atrophy was 178.8 (nine times of cut-off value) with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 85.7%. Serum tTGA levels can be used to predict villous atrophy and biopsy may be avoided in strongly suspected cases with more than 9 times of cut-offs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,488,947
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#942
of 1,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,664
of 309,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,551 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.