↓ Skip to main content

Examining the Role of Repetitive Negative Thinking in Relations Between Positive and Negative Aspects of Self-compassion and Symptom Improvement During Intensive Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Therapy and Research, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Examining the Role of Repetitive Negative Thinking in Relations Between Positive and Negative Aspects of Self-compassion and Symptom Improvement During Intensive Treatment
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10608-017-9887-0
Authors

Lauren P. Wadsworth, Marie Forgeard, Kean J. Hsu, Sarah Kertz, Michael Treadway, Thröstur Björgvinsson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Researcher 5 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 50 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 46%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 52 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,630,070
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#530
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,315
of 449,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.