| Title |
The British Late Middle Palaeolithic: An Interpretative Synthesis of Neanderthal Occupation at the Northwestern Edge of the Pleistocene World
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of World Prehistory, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10963-011-9043-9 |
| Authors |
Mark J. White, Paul B. Pettitt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 28% |
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 46 | 43% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Journal of World Prehistory
#104
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,285
of 110,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of World Prehistory
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them