↓ Skip to main content

AFLP Phylogeny of 36 Erythroxylum Species

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Plant Biology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
AFLP Phylogeny of 36 Erythroxylum Species
Published in
Tropical Plant Biology, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12042-011-9070-9
Authors

Stephen D. Emche, Dapeng Zhang, Melissa B. Islam, Bryan A. Bailey, Lyndel W. Meinhardt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Master 7 21%
Professor 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 68%
Chemistry 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Plant Biology
#14
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,402
of 183,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Plant Biology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.