↓ Skip to main content

Mass nouns and plural logic

Overview of attention for article published in Linguistics and Philosophy, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 211)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Mass nouns and plural logic
Published in
Linguistics and Philosophy, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10988-008-9033-2
Authors

David Nicolas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 4%
France 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 17 65%
Philosophy 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Linguistics and Philosophy
#38
of 211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,754
of 81,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Linguistics and Philosophy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them