↓ Skip to main content

Possible Ways of Spreading and Evolution of Alcids

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Bulletin, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 250)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Possible Ways of Spreading and Evolution of Alcids
Published in
Biology Bulletin, September 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1020457508769
Authors

N. B. Konyukhov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 50%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biology Bulletin
#38
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,026
of 48,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Bulletin
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them