↓ Skip to main content

Localization of photosynthetic metabolism in the parasitic angiosperm Cuscuta reflexa

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Localization of photosynthetic metabolism in the parasitic angiosperm Cuscuta reflexa
Published in
Planta, June 1998
DOI 10.1007/s004250050349
Authors

J. M. Hibberd, R. A. Bungard, M. C. Press, W. D. Jeschke, J. D. Scholes, W. P. Quick

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 22%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#674
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,604
of 33,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.