↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of Unprotected Anal Intercourse Among HIV-Positive Latino Gay and Bisexual Men

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of Unprotected Anal Intercourse Among HIV-Positive Latino Gay and Bisexual Men
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10461-004-7322-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul J. Poppen, Carol A. Reisen, María Cecilia Zea, Fernanda T. Bianchi, John J. Echeverry

Abstract

This study examined sexual behaviors in a sample of 155 HIV-positive Latino gay and bisexual men. Nearly half the sample had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse in the past 12 months; unprotected anal intercourse was more likely when the partner was also HIV-positive. Separate regression models predicted the number of receptive and insertive partners for unprotected anal intercourse. Participants reported both more unprotected insertive and receptive partners if they had sex under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Older participants and those with lower levels of Latino acculturation reported having more partners with whom they took the receptive role during unprotected anal intercourse, whereas those with higher levels of depression reported having more partners with whom they took the insertive role. Hierarchical set logistic regression revealed that the dyadic variable of seroconcordance added to the prediction of unprotected anal sex with the most recent male partner, beyond the individual characteristics. Results show the importance of examining both individual and dyadic characteristics in the study of sexual behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 27%
Social Sciences 14 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Unspecified 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#19,246,640
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#3,007
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,884
of 143,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.