↓ Skip to main content

Outline of the classification of flowering plants (magnoliophyta)

Overview of attention for article published in The Botanical Review, July 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
26 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
732 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Outline of the classification of flowering plants (magnoliophyta)
Published in
The Botanical Review, July 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf02861558
Authors

Armen L. Takhtajan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 4%
United States 3 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 107 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#75
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,732
of 6,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them