↓ Skip to main content

Children’s experiences of congenital heart disease: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
40 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
Title
Children’s experiences of congenital heart disease: a systematic review of qualitative studies
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00431-017-3081-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren S. H. Chong, Dominic A. Fitzgerald, Jonathan C. Craig, Karine E. Manera, Camilla S. Hanson, David Celermajer, Julian Ayer, Nadine A. Kasparian, Allison Tong

Abstract

We aimed to describe the experiences of children and adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD). Electronic databases were searched until August 2016. Qualitative studies of children's perspectives on CHD were included. Data was extracted using thematic synthesis. From 44 studies from 12 countries involving 995 children, we identified 6 themes: disrupting normality (denying the diagnosis, oscillating between sickness and health, destabilizing the family dynamic), powerlessness in deteriorating health (preoccupation with impending mortality, vulnerability to catastrophic complications, exhaustion from medical testing), enduring medical ordeals (traumatized by invasive procedures, disappointed by treatment failure, displaced by transition, valuing empathy and continuity in care, overcoming uncertainty with information), warring with the body (losing stamina, distressing inability to participate in sport, distorted body image, testing the limits), hampering potential and goals (feeling disabled, unfair judgment and exclusion, difficulties with academic achievement, limiting attainment and maintenance of life milestones), and establishing one's own pace (demarcating disease from life, determination to survive, taking limitations in their stride, embracing the positives, finding personal enrichment, relying on social or spiritual support). Children with CHD feel vulnerable and burdened by debilitating physical symptoms, unpredictable complications, and discrimination. Clinicians may support patients by sharing recognition of these profound psychosocial consequences. What is Known: • CHD is associated with difficulties in learning and attention, school absenteeism, decreased endurance, poor body image, and peer socialization • What is lesser known is how young patients cope with the symptoms, prognostic uncertainty, and treatment burden What is New: • We found that children are challenged by lifestyle restrictions, fear of invasive procedures, impaired body image, discrimination, and uncertainty about the future. Feelings of disempowerment are intensified by the unpredictability of disease progression • Thus, strategies to improve outcomes include improved patient education on disease and lifestyle management and partnership with school teachers and counselors for unique psychosocial support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 232 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 90 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 14%
Psychology 33 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 101 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,453,367
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#117
of 4,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,894
of 453,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#4
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.