| Title |
Nitrogen fertilization and nitrate pollution in groundwater in Japan: Present status and measures for sustainable agriculture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, July 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1021198721003 |
| Authors |
Kikuo Kumazawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 22% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,288,526
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#52
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,913
of 47,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them