↓ Skip to main content

The natural history of Hendra and Nipah viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Microbes & Infection, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
22 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
329 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
345 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The natural history of Hendra and Nipah viruses
Published in
Microbes & Infection, April 2001
DOI 10.1016/s1286-4579(01)01384-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hume Field, Peter Young, Johara Mohd Yob, James Mills, Les Hall, John Mackenzie

Abstract

Pteropid bats (flying foxes), species of which are the probable natural host of both Hendra and Nipah viruses, occur in overlapping populations from India to Australia. Ecological changes associated with land use and with animal husbandry practices appear most likely to be associated with the emergence of these two agents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 4 1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 328 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 19%
Student > Bachelor 61 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 14%
Student > Master 45 13%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 59 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 31 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 9%
Environmental Science 21 6%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 67 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,164,534
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Microbes & Infection
#105
of 2,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#715
of 43,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbes & Infection
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.