↓ Skip to main content

Answer to the Letter to the Editor of T. Kawada concerning “Risk factors for sciatica leading to hospitalization” by U. Euro et al. Eur Spine J (2017). doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5182-8

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of T. Kawada concerning “Risk factors for sciatica leading to hospitalization” by U. Euro et al. Eur Spine J (2017). doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5182-8
Published in
European Spine Journal, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00586-017-5408-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulla Euro, P. Knekt, H. Rissanen, A. Aromaa, J. Karppinen, M. Heliövaara

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,459,801
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#3,684
of 4,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#372,975
of 437,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#54
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,666 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.