↓ Skip to main content

The Adult Asperger Assessment (AAA): A Diagnostic Method

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
Title
The Adult Asperger Assessment (AAA): A Diagnostic Method
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10803-005-0026-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Baron-Cohen, Sally Wheelwright, Janine Robinson, Marc Woodbury-Smith

Abstract

At the present time there are a large number of adults who have suspected Asperger syndrome (AS). In this paper we describe a new instrument, the Adult Asperger Assessment (AAA), developed in our clinic for adults with AS. The need for a new instrument relevant to the diagnosis of AS in adulthood arises because existing instruments are designed for use with children. Properties of the AAA include (1) being electronic, data-based, and computer-scorable; (2) linking with two screening instruments [the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and the Empathy Quotient (EQ)]; and (3) employing a more stringent set of diagnostic criteria than DSM-IV, in order to avoid false positives. The AAA is described, and its use with a series of n = 42 clinic-patients is reported. Thirty-seven of these (88%) met DSM-IV criteria, but only 34 of these (80%) met AAA criteria. The AAA is therefore more conservative than DSM-IV.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 267 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Researcher 38 13%
Student > Master 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Other 25 9%
Other 83 28%
Unknown 39 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 125 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 18%
Social Sciences 22 8%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 47 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#4,461,663
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,825
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,095
of 151,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.