↓ Skip to main content

Offending Behaviour in Adults with Asperger Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Offending Behaviour in Adults with Asperger Syndrome
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10803-007-0442-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Allen, Carys Evans, Andrew Hider, Sarah Hawkins, Helen Peckett, Hugh Morgan

Abstract

Considerable speculation is evident both within the scientific literature and popular media regarding possible links between Asperger syndrome and offending. A survey methodology that utilised quantitative data collection was employed to investigate the prevalence of offending behaviour amongst adults with Asperger Syndrome in a large geographical area of South Wales, UK; qualitative interviews were then conducted with a sub-sample of those identified. A small number of participants meeting the study criteria were identified. For those who had offended, their experience of the criminal justice system was essentially negative. Possible implications of the results were discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 191 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 34%
Social Sciences 26 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 53 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,010,601
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,800
of 5,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,449
of 82,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.