↓ Skip to main content

Modelling of adequate and safe vitamin D intake in Danish women using different fortification and supplementation scenarios to inform fortification policies

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Modelling of adequate and safe vitamin D intake in Danish women using different fortification and supplementation scenarios to inform fortification policies
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00394-017-1586-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ida M. Grønborg, Inge Tetens, Majken Ege, Tue Christensen, Elisabeth Wreford Andersen, Rikke Andersen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 21 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Unspecified 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 23 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,101,867
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#551
of 2,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,370
of 456,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#14
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.