| Title |
Neurohumoral alterations and their role in amoebiasis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02867414 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naheed Banu, Kashif R. Zaidi, Ghazala Mehdi, Tariq Mansoor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2008.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry
#95
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,164
of 56,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them