↓ Skip to main content

Genetic evidence for early flax domestication with capsular dehiscence

Overview of attention for article published in Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Genetic evidence for early flax domestication with capsular dehiscence
Published in
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10722-010-9650-9
Authors

Yong-Bi Fu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 32%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 55%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Philosophy 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#273
of 714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,288
of 182,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them