| Title |
Sulfuric acid in the phaeophyte alga Desmarestiamunda deters feeding by the sea urchin Strongylocentrotusdroebachiensis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, July 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-002-0809-6 |
| Authors |
K. Pelletreau, G. Muller-Parker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,238
of 3,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,162
of 44,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.