↓ Skip to main content

The emergence of a group of four characters (Vāsudeva, Saṃkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna, and Aniruddha) in the Harivaṃśa: points for consideration

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Indian Philosophy, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 252)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The emergence of a group of four characters (Vāsudeva, Saṃkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna, and Aniruddha) in the Harivaṃśa: points for consideration
Published in
Journal of Indian Philosophy, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10781-006-9009-x
Authors

André Couture

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 3 43%
Unknown 4 57%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 43%
Student > Master 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 57%
Arts and Humanities 2 29%
Engineering 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Indian Philosophy
#27
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,809
of 160,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Indian Philosophy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them